petroccia.bib

@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.92}}
@comment{{Command line: bib2bib -oc petroccia -ob petroccia.bib -c 'author : "Petroccia"' all.bib}}
@inproceedings{PetrioliPS08,
  author = {Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  title = {A Comparative Performance Evaluation of {MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2008},
  month = {September 15-18},
  year = {2008},
  publisher = {MTS/IEEE Computer Society},
  address = {Quebec City}
}
@article{BasagniPP07J,
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  title = {Efficiently Reconfigurable Backbones for Wireless Sensor Networks},
  journal = {Elsevier Computer Communications Journal, special issue on Algorithmic and Theoretical Aspects of Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, S. Misra, editor},
  volume = {31},
  issue = {4},
  pages = {668--698},
  month = {March},
  year = {2008}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniPP07,
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  title = {Fail-safe Hierarchical Organization for Wireless Sensor Networks},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications
		  Conference, MILCOM 2007},
  pages = {1--7},
  year = 2007,
  address = {Orlando, FL},
  month = {October 29--31},
  abstract = {This paper presents the definition and evaluation of a new
		  protocol for providing a wireless sensor network (WSN) with
		  a hierarchical organization. Differently from previously
		  proposed solutions, our protocol, termed CC (``double c,''
		  for \emph{clique clustering}), includes in its operation a
		  fail-safe mechanism for dealing with node failure or
		  removal, which are typical of WSNs. More specifically, the
		  network is partitioned into clusters that are
		  \emph{cliques}, i.e., nodes in each clusters are directly
		  connected to each others. An efficient mechanism for
		  building a connected backbone among the clusters is
		  provided within CC that is also resilient to node failure.
		  Both clustering and backbone formation are completely
		  localized, in the precise sense that only nodes physically
		  close to a failing node are involved in the reconfiguration
		  process. We compare the performance of CC with that of
		  DMAC, a protocol that has been previously proposed for
		  building and maintaining clusters and backbones in presence
		  of node removal. Our comparison concerns metrics that are
		  central to WSN research, such as time for clustering and
		  backbone reorganization, corresponding overhead (in bytes
		  and transmission energy), backbone size, extent of (i.e.,
		  number of nodes involved in) the reorganization, and
		  backbone route length. Our ns2-based simulation results
		  show that the design criteria chosen for CC are effective
		  in producing backbones that can be reconfigured quickly
		  ($152\%$ faster than DMAC's) and with remarkably lower
		  overhead (one order of magnitude less than for DMAC).}
}
@article{BasagniPP08,
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  title = {Efficiently Reconfigurable Backbones for Wireless Sensor
		  Networks},
  journal = {Computer Communications Journal, Special Issue on
		  Algorithmic and Theoretical Aspects of Wireless Ad Hoc and
		  Sensor Networks, S.~Misra, ed.},
  volume = 31,
  number = 4,
  pages = {668--698},
  month = {March 5},
  year = 2008,
  abstract = {We present the definition and performance evaluation of a
		  protocol for building and maintaining a connected backbone
		  among the nodes of a wireless sensor networks (WSN).
		  Building backbones first, and then coping with network
		  dynamics is typical of protocols for backbone formation.
		  Rules for building the backbone, however, do not take into
		  account the following network dynamics explicitly. This
		  makes maintaining a connected backbone quite costly,
		  especially in terms of reorganization time, overhead and
		  energy consumption. Our protocol includes in the backbone
		  forming operations a fail-safe mechanism for dealing with
		  the addition and the removal of nodes, which are typical
		  events in a WSN. More specifically, the network is kept
		  partitioned into clusters that are \emph{cliques}, i.e.,
		  nodes in each cluster are directly connected to each
		  others. Therefore, removing a node does not disrupt a
		  cluster, and adding one requires simple operations for
		  checking node admission to the cluster. The protocol,
		  termed CC (``double c,'' for \emph{clique clustering}),
		  comprises three phases, each designed to render the
		  operations of the others swift and efficient. The first
		  phase partitions the network into clusters that are
		  cliques. Clusters are then joined to form a backbone that
		  is provably connected. Finally, the third, more on-line
		  phase, maintains the backbone connected in face of node
		  additions and removals. We compare the performance of CC
		  with that of DMAC, a protocol that has been previously
		  proposed for building and maintaining clusters and
		  backbones in presence of network dynamics. Our comparison
		  concerns metrics that are central to WSN research, such as
		  time for clustering and backbone reorganization,
		  corresponding overhead, extent of the reorganization (i.e.,
		  number of nodes involved in it), and properties of the
		  resulting backbone, such as its size, backbone route
		  length, number of gateway and nodes per cluster. Our
		  ns2-based simulation results show that the design criteria
		  chosen for CC are effective in producing backbones that can
		  be reconfigured quickly and with remarkably lower overhead.}
}
@techreport{BasagniPP06tr,
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  title = {Clique Clustering},
  institution = {Dipartimento di Informatica, Universit\`a di Roma ``La
		  Sapienza''},
  year = {2006},
  number = {09/2006},
  address = {Roma, Italy},
  month = {August}
}
@article{BasagniPPS09,
  title = {Choosing the Packet Size in Multi-hop Underwater Networks},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  journal = { Technical Report 06/2009, Dipartimento di Informatica, Universit\`a
  di Roma ``La Sapienza'', Rome, Italy},
  year = {2009},
  month = {June}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniPPS09-2,
  title = {Multiplexing Data and Control Channels in Random Access Underwater Networks},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2009},
  year = {2009},
  address = {Biloxi, Mississippi, USA, October},
  month = {October,26--29}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniNPP09,
  title = {{ROME}: Routing Over Mobile Elements in {WSNs},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Nati, M. and  Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2009},
  year = {2009},
  address = {Honolulu, Hawaii, USA},
  month = {30 November -- 4 December},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniPPS10,
  title = {Choosing the Packet Size in Multi-hop Underwater Networks},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2010},
  year = {2010},
  address = {Sydney, Australia},
  month = {May, 24--27},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniPPS10-2,
  title = {Optimizing Network Performance through Packet Fragmentation in Multi-hop Underwater Communications},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2010},
  year = {2010},
  address = {Sydney, Australia},
  month = {May, 24--27},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{PetrioliPSF11,
  title = {From underwater simulation to at-sea testing using the ns-2 network simulator},
  author = {Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Shusta, J. and Freitag, L.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2011},
  year = {2011},
  address = {Santander, Spain},
  month = {June, 6--9},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{PetrioliPP11,
  title = {Performance evaluation of underwater {MAC} protocols: From simulation to at-sea testing},
  author = {Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Potter, J.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2011},
  year = {2011},
  address = {Santander, Spain},
  month = {June, 6--9},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{AzadCPPZ11,
  title = {On the impact of the environment on {MAC} and routing in shallow water scenarios},
  author = {Azad, S. and  Casari, P. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Zorzi, M.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2011},
  year = {2011},
  address = {Santander, Spain},
  month = {June, 6--9},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{AnnunziatellisGLPP12,
  title = {{CO2Net}: A marine monitoring system for {CO2} leakage detection},
  author = {Annunziatellis, A.  and Graziani, S. and Lombardi, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2012},
  year = {2012},
  address = {Yeosu, Korea},
  month = {May, 21--24},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{BasagniPPS12,
  title = {Channel-aware Routing for Underwater Wireless Networks},
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Spaccini, D.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS 2012},
  year = {2012},
  address = {Yeosu, Korea},
  month = {May, 21--24},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@article{BasagniPPS12J,
  author = {Basagni, S. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Stojanovic, M.},
  title = {Optimized Packet Size Selection in Underwater WSN Communications},
  journal = {IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering [accepted for publication]}
}
@article{PetrioliPP12J,
  author = {Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Potter, J.},
  title = {Performance evaluation of underwater {MAC} protocols: From simulation to at-sea testing},
  journal = {IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering [submitted for publication]}
}
@inproceedings{CruzFMPPS12,
  title = {Implementation of an Underwater Acoustic Network using Multiple Heterogeneous Vehicles},
  author = {Cruz, N. A. and Ferreira, B. M. and Matos, A. C. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Spaccini, D.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2012},
  year = {2012},
  address = {Hampton Roads, Virginia, USA},
  month = {October, 14--19},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{LoprestiPPS12,
  title = {A Scalable Analytical Framework for Deriving Optimum Scheduling and Routing in Underwater Sensor Networks},
  author = {Lo Presti, F. and Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R. and Shashaj, A.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE MASS 2012},
  year = {2012},
  address = {Las Vegas, Nevada, USA},
  month = {October, 8--11},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}
@inproceedings{PetrioliP12,
  title = {{SUNSET}: Simulation, Emulation and Real-life Testing of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks},
  author = {Petrioli, C. and Petroccia, R.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE UComms 2012},
  year = {2012},
  address = {Sestri Levante, Italy},
  month = {September, 12--14},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}
}

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.92.